<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2011 &#8211; An addressing odyssey. Preparing enterprise for IPv6.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andyd.net/2008/2011-an-addressing-odyssey-preparing-enterprise-for-ipv6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andyd.net/2008/2011-an-addressing-odyssey-preparing-enterprise-for-ipv6/</link>
	<description>Andy Davidson\&#039;s tech blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.andyd.net/2008/2011-an-addressing-odyssey-preparing-enterprise-for-ipv6/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyd.net/index.php/2008/12/04/2011-an-addressing-odyssey-preparing-enterprise-for-ipv6/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Thank you - all good suggestions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thank you &#8211; all good suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trejrco</title>
		<link>http://www.andyd.net/2008/2011-an-addressing-odyssey-preparing-enterprise-for-ipv6/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>trejrco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyd.net/index.php/2008/12/04/2011-an-addressing-odyssey-preparing-enterprise-for-ipv6/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Great presentation; however - couple of nits ... 

One thing I like to mention when talking about the size of the v6 address space is that it is a little more technically accurate to think of it as approximately 2^64 networks, each of which can support the &quot;appropriate&quot; number of hosts (up to 2^64 (18Billion Billion or so, FWIW), but I am fairly confident that that will never happen :)  ).

I would reword &quot;one set of zero values seperated by colons&quot; to something like &quot;replacing some number of sequential, all-zero &#039;chunks&#039;, one time per address&quot; ... 

&quot;Private Addressing&quot; is not so much replaced with Link Locals; the closest analogy in IPv4 is APIPA ... RFC1918 == Unique Locals

DHCP(v6) is not deprecated for Address Assignment, the DHC WG would blow a coronary to hear you say that!  (Although client support is not currently widespread)

I&#039;d change the Windows screen-shot to not use the 6Bone address space :).

Friendlier implementations of Ping/Traceroute are indeed multi-protocol ... any that aren&#039;t should catch up!


Again, overall - great read ... and keep getting the word out :).
/TJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great presentation; however &#8211; couple of nits &#8230; </p>
<p>One thing I like to mention when talking about the size of the v6 address space is that it is a little more technically accurate to think of it as approximately 2^64 networks, each of which can support the &#8220;appropriate&#8221; number of hosts (up to 2^64 (18Billion Billion or so, FWIW), but I am fairly confident that that will never happen :)  ).</p>
<p>I would reword &#8220;one set of zero values seperated by colons&#8221; to something like &#8220;replacing some number of sequential, all-zero &#8216;chunks&#8217;, one time per address&#8221; &#8230; </p>
<p>&#8220;Private Addressing&#8221; is not so much replaced with Link Locals; the closest analogy in IPv4 is APIPA &#8230; RFC1918 == Unique Locals</p>
<p>DHCP(v6) is not deprecated for Address Assignment, the DHC WG would blow a coronary to hear you say that!  (Although client support is not currently widespread)</p>
<p>I&#8217;d change the Windows screen-shot to not use the 6Bone address space :).</p>
<p>Friendlier implementations of Ping/Traceroute are indeed multi-protocol &#8230; any that aren&#8217;t should catch up!</p>
<p>Again, overall &#8211; great read &#8230; and keep getting the word out :).<br />
/TJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.andyd.net/2008/2011-an-addressing-odyssey-preparing-enterprise-for-ipv6/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyd.net/index.php/2008/12/04/2011-an-addressing-odyssey-preparing-enterprise-for-ipv6/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Thank you Thor ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Thor ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorleif Wiik</title>
		<link>http://www.andyd.net/2008/2011-an-addressing-odyssey-preparing-enterprise-for-ipv6/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorleif Wiik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyd.net/index.php/2008/12/04/2011-an-addressing-odyssey-preparing-enterprise-for-ipv6/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Andy, very nice presentation !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, very nice presentation !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

