Mac VNC Client for Linux KVM
When you build a KVM guest, if you want to install the guest over the network, you should attach the video console of your guest to a VNC display.
How can I put this..? This is quite a novel way of doing it. I think there’s a reason that more virtualisation systems don’t work in this way. VNC is not great, but I am sure there is a reason that I can’t use a dummy serial port instead. I’d have preferred RDP, but perhaps there’s a reason I can’t use that too.
I normally use Chicken of the VNC as a mac osx client, because it has a funny name, and has always worked. However, it crashes and burns (see screen shot) when trying to install Debian on a KVM guest. Hopefully I can save someone else an evenings’s worth of trying every other mac vnc client, and offer the fix. Just use VNCViewer. I tried this after half a dozen others which all failed in a similar way to Chicken.
Any comments on why RDP or Serial might not have been better welcome.
Posted: March 30th, 2008 under Sys Admin, Linux, networking, mac, kvm.
Comments: 3
3 Responses to “Mac VNC Client for Linux KVM”
Write a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Related articles
- Internationalisation of DNS continues (February 8th, 2008)
- Text editors to be placed on endangered species list (January 21st, 2008)
- If VoIP kills phreaking, who are tomorrow’s engineers? (October 29th, 2007)
- Making the right ipv6 noises (October 25th, 2007)
- Making Round Robin DNS usable. (October 14th, 2007)

April 6th, 2008 at 9:05 am
The main reason you couldn’t use RDP is because it’s an MS protocol. There is only one non-MS implementation in the wild (xrdp), and that only works with X.org via Xvnc anyway.
April 6th, 2008 at 9:11 am
Also, VNC was probably chosen for openness and ubiquity. Most devices have a VNC viewer these days. Using an open protocol rather than writing a custom UI seems like a fairly sensible shortcut. The problem only comes to light because all Mac VNC software sucks as, it seems, you have discovered!
May 4th, 2008 at 8:49 pm
None…
None…